Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- cours:mit_2017_2018:personnal_paper_method [2018/02/20 14:00]
tigli [Few advices to write a interesting paper]
+++ cours:mit_2017_2018:personnal_paper_method [2018/02/20 14:50] (Version actuelle)
tigli [Main search engines and best practice]
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
 ===== Some Elements for the Methodology and Best Practices ... =====
-==== Few advices to write a interesting paper ====
+==== Few advices to write an interesting paper ====
+== Questions that must be answered before all ==
+  * What is the added value of the paper ?
+  * What is the gain for the reader ?
+  * What is the purpose of the paper ?
+  * What is the purpose of the reader when he's reading the paper ?
+  * If the reader has to decide something technical thanks to the paper, how the paper can help him ?
+  * Why the reader pay for this paper ?
+** One of the relevant measure is how many saved  time to apprehend a topic thansk to the paper **
+  * Example 1 : Introduction to Cloud Computing (one hour of reading for one hour on the web !) : **no gain !**
+  * Example 2 : Comparison between technologies for Tagged Objects and the existing solution on the market (one hour of reading for ten hours on the web !): **90 % of saved time!**
 == Short is better ==
@@ Ligne 10: / Ligne 25: @@
 ** The student paper will be 3 or 4 pages long **
-== Some advices about References ==
+==== Some advices about References ====
   * References must be used to shortly introduce interesting ideas, studies and analysis that were explained in the referenced paper
@@ Ligne 22: / Ligne 37: @@
   * Quality of references must be guarantee, thanks to :
+     * Selection process with reviewer, like for research papers (conferences proceedings and journals) from well-known scientific publishers : IEEE, ACM, Springer Verlag, Elsevier ..
+     * Consortiums bringing together major actors of a technical domain like Standards Organization(ETSI, IEEE standards, IETF, W3C, OASIS, UPnP ...)
+     * Sometimes (but be careful) some white papers comming from well-known research and advisory firms, famous companies with an internal Research Department : (Gartner, Inc., Oracle, IBM, etc.)
+==== Main search engines and best practice ====
+[[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp|IEEE Xplore Digital Library (paid access)]]
+[[https://dl.acm.org/|ACM Digital Library (paid access)]]
+[[https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science|Elsevier Digital Library]
+[[http://www.springer.com/fr/|Springer Digital Library]]
+[[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/index|citeseerx (free access)]]
+[[https://scholar.google.fr/|Google Scholar]]
+[[https://www.researchgate.net/|Researchgate]]
+== reference ==
+[[https://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/notes/tools/SearchEngineIndex_v5.pdf|Digital Libraries and Search Engines for Software Engineering Research: An Overview                                                Mark Turner, Technical report of Keele University, Version 5 – January 2010 ]]
+==== Example of Paper Template ====
+  * **Research Paper (for a comparison between research works) **
+      * Abstract section  must explain at least what is the topic and the purpose of the paper
+      * Introduction section must explain
+         * why this paper and the context of the topic
+         * what is the plan of the paper
+      * "Related works" section must give a list of the research that are significant in the topic adressed by the paper
+      * "Discussion" section must clearly define all the characteristics and the used criteria for comparison.
+      * "Discussion" section must produce a synthesis array with all the compared solutions in columns and all the characteristics in lines, checked or not.
+      * "Conclusion and Perspective" section conclude the discussion with the main ideas of the discussion and what are the hot topics to go ahead.
-    * Selection process with reviewer, like for research papers (conferences proceedings and journals) from well-known scientific publishers : IEEE, ACM, Springer Verlag, Elsevier ..
+  * **Technical Paper ** (for a comparison between technological solutions)
+      * Abstract section  must explain at least what is the topic and the purpose of the paper
+      * Introduction section must explain
+         * why this paper and the context of the topic
+         * what is the plan of the paper
+      * "Main Characteritics" section must clearly define all the characteristics of a common description of the solutions.
+      *  "Main Characteritics" section must give a list of the technological operationnal solutions, even  of the market.
+      * "Discussion" section must produce a synthesis array with all the compared solutions in columns and all the characteristics in lines, checked or not.
+      * "Discussion" section may provide some advices on the bast solutions in various use cases and illustrations
+      * "Conclusion and Perspective" section conclude the discussion with the main ideas of the discussion and what are the hot topics to go ahead.
-    * Consortiums bringing together major actors of a technical domain like Standards Organization(ETSI, IEEE standards, IETF, W3C, OASIS, UPnP ...)
-    * Sometimes (but be careful) some white papers comming from well-known research and advisory firms, famous companies with an internal Research Department : (Gartner, Inc., Oracle, IBM, etc.)
-==== Best Search Engines for scientific papers on ICT ====
-[[https://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/notes/tools/SearchEngineIndex_v5.pdf|Search Engines]]
 ==== Paper Format ====

JY Tigli Homepages

Outils pour utilisateurs

Outils du site

Différences

Outils de la page