Outils pour utilisateurs
cours:mit_2017_2018:personnal_paper_method
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
cours:mit_2017_2018:personnal_paper_method [2018/02/20 14:01] tigli [Few advices to write a interesting paper] |
cours:mit_2017_2018:personnal_paper_method [2018/02/20 14:50] (Version actuelle) tigli [Main search engines and best practice] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
| ===== Some Elements for the Methodology and Best Practices ... ===== | ===== Some Elements for the Methodology and Best Practices ... ===== | ||
| - | ==== Few advices to write a interesting paper ==== | + | ==== Few advices to write an interesting paper ==== |
| + | |||
| + | == Questions that must be answered before all == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * What is the added value of the paper ? | ||
| + | * What is the gain for the reader ? | ||
| + | * What is the purpose of the paper ? | ||
| + | * What is the purpose of the reader when he's reading the paper ? | ||
| + | * If the reader has to decide something technical thanks to the paper, how the paper can help him ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Why the reader pay for this paper ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** One of the relevant measure is how many saved time to apprehend a topic thansk to the paper ** | ||
| + | * Example 1 : Introduction to Cloud Computing (one hour of reading for one hour on the web !) : **no gain !** | ||
| + | * Example 2 : Comparison between technologies for Tagged Objects and the existing solution on the market (one hour of reading for ten hours on the web !): **90 % of saved time!** | ||
| == Short is better == | == Short is better == | ||
| Ligne 10: | Ligne 25: | ||
| ** The student paper will be 3 or 4 pages long ** | ** The student paper will be 3 or 4 pages long ** | ||
| - | == Some advices about References == | + | ==== Some advices about References ==== |
| * References must be used to shortly introduce interesting ideas, studies and analysis that were explained in the referenced paper | * References must be used to shortly introduce interesting ideas, studies and analysis that were explained in the referenced paper | ||
| Ligne 27: | Ligne 42: | ||
| - | ==== Best Search Engines for scientific papers on ICT ==== | + | ==== Main search engines and best practice ==== |
| + | |||
| + | [[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp|IEEE Xplore Digital Library (paid access)]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://dl.acm.org/|ACM Digital Library (paid access)]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://www.elsevier.com/about/open-science|Elsevier Digital Library] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http://www.springer.com/fr/|Springer Digital Library]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/index|citeseerx (free access)]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://scholar.google.fr/|Google Scholar]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://www.researchgate.net/|Researchgate]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == reference == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/notes/tools/SearchEngineIndex_v5.pdf|Digital Libraries and Search Engines for Software Engineering Research: An Overview Mark Turner, Technical report of Keele University, Version 5 – January 2010 ]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Example of Paper Template ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Research Paper (for a comparison between research works) ** | ||
| + | * Abstract section must explain at least what is the topic and the purpose of the paper | ||
| + | * Introduction section must explain | ||
| + | * why this paper and the context of the topic | ||
| + | * what is the plan of the paper | ||
| + | * "Related works" section must give a list of the research that are significant in the topic adressed by the paper | ||
| + | * "Discussion" section must clearly define all the characteristics and the used criteria for comparison. | ||
| + | * "Discussion" section must produce a synthesis array with all the compared solutions in columns and all the characteristics in lines, checked or not. | ||
| + | * "Conclusion and Perspective" section conclude the discussion with the main ideas of the discussion and what are the hot topics to go ahead. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Technical Paper ** (for a comparison between technological solutions) | ||
| + | * Abstract section must explain at least what is the topic and the purpose of the paper | ||
| + | * Introduction section must explain | ||
| + | * why this paper and the context of the topic | ||
| + | * what is the plan of the paper | ||
| + | * "Main Characteritics" section must clearly define all the characteristics of a common description of the solutions. | ||
| + | * "Main Characteritics" section must give a list of the technological operationnal solutions, even of the market. | ||
| + | * "Discussion" section must produce a synthesis array with all the compared solutions in columns and all the characteristics in lines, checked or not. | ||
| + | * "Discussion" section may provide some advices on the bast solutions in various use cases and illustrations | ||
| + | * "Conclusion and Perspective" section conclude the discussion with the main ideas of the discussion and what are the hot topics to go ahead. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| - | [[https://community.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/notes/tools/SearchEngineIndex_v5.pdf|Search Engines]] | ||
| ==== Paper Format ==== | ==== Paper Format ==== | ||
cours/mit_2017_2018/personnal_paper_method.1519131664.txt.gz · Dernière modification: 2018/02/20 14:01 par tigli
Outils de la page
Sauf mention contraire, le contenu de ce wiki est placé sous les termes de la licence suivante : CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
